Peritoneal Phosphate Clearance: Determinants and Association With Mortality.

BACKGROUND: Dialytic phosphate removal is a cornerstone of the management of hyperphosphatemia in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients, but the influencing factors on peritoneal phosphate clearance (PPC) are incompletely understood. Our objective was to explore clinically relevant factors associated with PPC in patients with different PD modality and peritoneal transport status and the association of PPC with mortality. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional and prospective observational study. Four hundred eighty-five PD patients were enrolled and divided into 2 groups according to PPC. All-cause mortality was evaluated after followed-up for at least 3 months. RESULTS: High PPC group showed lower mortality compared with Low PPC group by Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test. Both multivariate linear regression and multivariate logistic regression revealed that high transport status, total effluent dialysate volume per day, continuous ambulatory PD (CAPD), and protein in total effluent dialysate volume appeared to be positively correlated with PPC; body mass index (BMI) and the normalized protein equivalent of total nitrogen appearance (nPNA) were negatively correlated with PPC. Besides PD modality and membrane transport status, total effluent dialysate volume showed a strong relationship with PPC, but the correlation differed among PD modalities. CONCLUSIONS: Higher PPC was associated with lower all-cause mortality risk in PD patients. Higher PPC correlated with CAPD modality, fast transport status, higher effluent dialysate volume and protein content, and with lower BMI and nPNA.

Tenapanor for peritoneal dialysis patients with hyperphosphatemia: a phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Tenapanor is a novel selective inhibitor of intestinal sodium/hydrogen exchanger 3 transporter. This is the first trial to assess the efficacy and safety of tenapanor in Japanese patients with hyperphosphatemia who are undergoing peritoneal dialysis. METHODS: This phase 3, open-label, multicenter, single-arm clinical trial targeted patients whose serum phosphorus was within 3.5-7.0 mg/dL with phosphate binders at screening. After phosphate binder washout, tenapanor was orally administered twice-daily, stepwise from 5 to 30 mg/dose for 16 weeks. The primary endpoint, mean change in serum phosphorus level, was evaluated at week 8. The 16-week treatment period was completed with tenapanor alone, and only one phosphate binder type was allowed for combined use after the primary endpoint. RESULTS: Of the 54 patients enrolled, 34 completed the study. At week 8, the primary endpoint, mean change in serum phosphorus level (last observation carried forward), was - 1.18 mg/dL (95% confidence interval: - 1.54, - 0.81 mg/dL) with tenapanor. From a baseline value of 7.65 mg/dL, serum phosphorus decreased to 6.14 and 5.44 mg/dL at weeks 8 and 16, respectively, and 46.3% and 76.5% of patients achieved serum phosphorus within 3.5-6.0 mg/dL at week 8 and week 16, respectively. The most common adverse event, diarrhea, occurred in 74.1% of patients; the severity of diarrhea was mild or moderate. Thus, the discontinuation percentage due to diarrhea was low at 5.6%. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of tenapanor resulted in a sufficient reduction in serum phosphorus level at week 8 and was considered safe and tolerable. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04766385.

Predictions of Serum Phosphate Concentration during Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy Using a Steady-State Mass Balance Model.

INTRODUCTION: Hypophosphatemia is common during continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), but serum phosphate levels can potentially be maintained during treatment by either intravenous phosphate supplementation or addition of phosphate to renal replacement therapy (RRT) solutions. METHODS: We developed a steady-state phosphate mass balance model to assess the effects of CRRT dose on serum phosphate concentration when using both phosphate-free and phosphate-containing RRT solutions, with emphasis on low CRRT doses. RESULTS: The model predicted that measurements of serum phosphate concentration prior to (initial) and during CRRT (final) together with clinical data on CRRT dose, treatment duration, and phosphate supplementation can determine model patient parameters, that is, both the initial generation rate and clearance of phosphate prior to CRRT. Model parameters were then calculated from average patient data reported in several previous publications with a standard or high CRRT dose. Using representative model parameters for typical patients, predictions were then made of the effect of low CRRT dose on the change in serum phosphate levels after implementation of CRRT. The model predicted that CRRT at a low dose using phosphate-free RRT solutions will limit, but not eliminate, the incidence of hypophosphatemia. Further, the model predicted that CRRT at a low dose will have virtually no influence on the incidence of hyperphosphatemia when using phosphate-containing RRT solutions. CONCLUSIONS: This report identifies the clinical measurements to be used with the proposed model for individualizing the CRRT dose and RRT phosphate concentration to maintain serum phosphate concentrations in a desired range.

Biochemical markers of iron status and iron accumulation in peritoneal dialysis patients treated with ferric citrate.

BACKGROUND: Hyperphosphataemia is a common complication of kidney disease. Current dialysis techniques do not provide enough phosphorus clearance, hence the need to use phosphorus binders. Treatment options include calcium carbonate, calcium acetate, lanthanum carbonate, sevelamer hydrochloride and iron-based binders. Patients receiving peritoneal dialysis (PD) with sustained elevated ferritin levels exceeding 800 ng/mL are at a higher risk of death. We identify PD patients treated with iron-based binders and compare ferritin and risk of iron accumulation to patients treated with non-iron-based binders. METHODS: All records of patients receiving PD at Emory dialysis centres until 30 October 2021 were reviewed for phosphorus binders. Basic demographics and laboratory data were time-referenced to the days on treatment with a particular binder. Patients were followed until discontinuation of the phosphorus binder, death, transplant, transfer to another dialysis provider or censoring at 36 months after medication was started. RESULTS: Compared to calcium acetate and sevelamer, ferric citrate utilisation in PD patients resulted in a sustained increase in ferritin. The proportion of patients with a ferritin equal to or greater than 800 ng/dL and transferrin saturation greater than 40% increased over time in patients treated with ferric citrate and was higher during the second and third year of follow-up compared to baseline values and to patients treated with calcium acetate or sevelamer. Two patients (7%) treated with ferric citrate developed clinically significant haemosiderosis. CONCLUSIONS: Use of ferric citrated in PD resulted in significant iron accumulation as judged by ferritin levels.

Efficacy and Safety of Sucroferric Oxyhydroxide Compared with Sevelamer Carbonate in Chinese Dialysis Patients with Hyperphosphataemia: A Randomised, Open-Label, Multicentre, 12-Week Phase III Study.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of sucroferric oxyhydroxide (SFOH) versus sevelamer carbonate in controlling serum phosphorus (sP) in adult Chinese dialysis patients with hyperphosphataemia (sP >1.78 mmol/L). METHODS: Open-label, randomised (1:1), active-controlled, parallel group, multicentre, phase III study of SFOH and sevelamer at starting doses corresponding to 1,500 mg iron/day and 2.4 g/day, respectively, with 8-week dose titration and 4-week maintenance (NCT03644264). Primary endpoint was non-inferiority analysis of change in sP from baseline to week 12. Secondary endpoints included sP over time and safety. RESULTS: 415 patients were screened; 286 were enrolled and randomised (142 and 144 to SFOH and sevelamer, respectively). Mean (SD) baseline sP: 2.38 (0.57) and 2.38 (0.52) mmol/L, respectively. Mean (SD) change in sP from baseline to week 12: - 0.71 (0.60) versus -0.63 (0.52) mmol/L, respectively; difference (sevelamer minus SFOH) in least squares means (95% CI): 0.08 mmol/L (-0.02, 0.18) with the lower limit of 95% CI above the non-inferiority margin of -0.34 mmol/L. The SFOH group achieved target sP (1.13-1.78 mmol/L) earlier than the sevelamer group (56.5% vs. 32.8% at week 4) and with a lower pill burden (mean 3.7 vs. 9.1 tablets/day over 4 weeks of maintenance, respectively). Safety and tolerability of SFOH was consistent with previous studies, and no new safety signals were observed. CONCLUSION: SFOH effectively reduced sP from baseline and was non-inferior to sevelamer after 12 weeks of treatment but had a lower pill burden in Chinese dialysis patients with hyperphosphataemia; SFOH benefit-risk profile is favourable in Chinese patients.

Health Economic Benefits of Introducing Sucroferric Oxyhydroxide in the Treatment of Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease under Dialysis in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Hyperphosphatemia is an electrolyte disorder highly prevalent in patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing hemodialysis (HD) that usually requires treatment with oral phosphate binders (PBs). Sucroferric oxyhydroxide (SO) is a calcium-free, iron-based PB indicated for the control of serum phosphorus. In the real-world setting, SO has shown clinical effectiveness with a lower pill burden and has also been associated with reduced hospital admission rates. This study aims to assess the potential economic benefits resulting from the introduction of SO to the health-care setting of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). An economic analysis using data from a retrospective real-world study that compared HD patients with uninterrupted SO prescriptions with patients who discontinued SO and switched to other PBs (oPBs). Annual drug costs for the estimated PB-eligible population in KSA were quantified. Costs per responder were estimated for all treatments. Hospital admissions' incidence rates were converted into annual inpatient cost savings and were deducted from drug costs to estimate the annual economic effect of SO versus oPBs. Sensitivity and breakeven analyses were also conducted. The eligible population for PB therapy in KSA was estimated at n = 14,748. Treating therapy-eligible populations exclusively with SO was estimated to generate annual inpatient cost-savings of SAR 107.4-119.4 million compared to treating the population with oPBs. The estimated economic effect signified overall annual savings ranging from SAR 82.8 to SAR 94.8 million when the population is treated with SO. Sensitivity analyses showed persistent cost savings. The estimated benefit-cost ratios showed that for every SAR 1 spent on SO, the expected return on investment was SAR 4.4-4.9. SO is an effective therapy that may result in substantial cost savings from reducing hospital admission costs that are attributable to hyperphosphatemia among HD patients.

Efficacy and Safety of Ferric Citrate on Hyperphosphatemia among Chinese Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease Undergoing Hemodialysis: A Phase III Multicenter Randomized Open-Label Active-Drug-Controlled Study.

INTRODUCTION: Hyperphosphatemia in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients is positively associated with mortality. Ferric citrate is a potent phosphorus binder that lowers serum phosphorus level and improves iron metabolism. We compared its efficacy and safety with active drugs in Chinese CKD patients with hemodialysis. METHODS: Chinese patients undergoing hemodialysis were randomized into two treatment groups in a 1:1 ratio, receiving either ferric citrate or sevelamer carbonate, respectively, for 12 weeks. Serum phosphorus levels, calcium concentration, and iron metabolism parameters were evaluated every 2 weeks. Frequency and severity of adverse events were recorded. RESULTS: 217 (90.4%) patients completed the study with balanced demographic and baseline characteristics between two groups. Ferric citrate decreased the serum phosphorus level to 0.59 ± 0.54 mmol/L, comparable to 0.56 ± 0.62 mmol/L by sevelamer carbonate. There was no significant difference between two groups (p > 0.05) in the proportion of patients with serum phosphorus levels reaching the target range, the response rate to the study drug, and the changes of corrected serum calcium concentrations, and intact-PTH levels at the end of treatment. The change of iron metabolism indicators in the ferric citrate group was significantly higher than those in the sevelamer carbonate group. There are 47 (40.5%) patients in the ferric citrate group, and 26 (21.3%) patients in the sevelamer carbonate group experienced drug-related treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs); most were mild and tolerable. Common drug-related TEAEs were gastrointestinal disorders, including diarrhea (12.9 vs. 2.5%), fecal discoloration (14.7 vs. 0%), and constipation (1.7 vs. 7.4%) in ferric citrate and sevelamer carbonate group. CONCLUSION: Ferric citrate capsules have good efficacy and safety in the control of hyperphosphatemia in adult patients with CKD undergoing hemodialysis. Efficacy is not inferior to sevelamer carbonate. The TEAEs were mostly mild and tolerated by the patients.

Family-centered empowerment approach to optimize phosphate management among hemodialysis patients: an experimental study.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the effect of a family-centered empowerment program on hyperphosphatemia management. METHOD: This experimental study was performed on 80 randomly selected eligible patients with hyperphosphatemia undergoing hemodialysis. Patients were assigned randomly to two groups of family-centered empowerment program (FCEPG) and control group (CG) by coin toss (40 people per group). Data collection tools were the researcher-made Phosphate Control Knowledge Scale, the researcher-made Adherence to Dietary Restriction of Phosphorus Intake Scale, the eight-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale, and serum phosphorus measurements. Data were collected before the intervention, one month, and three months after the intervention. Patients in FCEPG participated in a family-centered empowerment program. The statistical significance level was considered to be 0.05. RESULTS: Inter-group comparisons showed no significant difference between FCEPG and CG in terms of the mean score of knowledge of phosphate control, adherence to dietary restriction of phosphorus intake, adherence to medication, and the mean serum phosphorus level before the empowerment program, but showed significant differences between them in these respects at one month after the program and three months after the program (p < 0.05). Intra-group comparisons showed a significant difference in FCEPG between the mean and standard deviation of all four variables before the empowerment program and the corresponding values one month and three months after the program (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The findings of this study can be used in various fields of healthcare in the hospital and community.

Effects of iron-based phosphate binders on mortality and cardiovascular events in patients receiving maintenance dialysis.

Phosphate binders are the main treatment for hyperphosphatemia in patients with chronic kidney disease, and iron-based phosphate binders have been used with increasing frequency in recent years. This study examined the association of the use of iron-based, rather than non-iron-based, phosphate binders with the incidence of cardiovascular events, in a real-world setting. We used data from a cohort comprising representative adult patients on maintenance hemodialysis in Japan. The exposure of interest was the time-varying use of phosphate binders, classified into "iron-based", "only non-iron-based", and "no use". The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular events and all-cause deaths. A marginal structural Cox regression model was used to deal with possible time-dependent confounding. Of the 2247 patients from 58 hemodialysis facilities, iron-based and only non-iron-based phosphate binders were used in 328 (15%) and 1360 (61%), respectively, at baseline. Hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for iron-based and non-iron-based phosphate binders versus no use of phosphate binders were 0.35 (0.24, 0.52) and 0.44 (0.33, 0.58), respectively. The hazard ratio for iron-based relative to non-iron-based phosphate binders was 0.81 (0.58, 1.13), which was not statistically significant. Further studies are warranted to elucidate whether the use of iron-based phosphate binders reduces the event rate.

Comparative Efficacy and Acceptability of 12 Phosphorus-Lowering Drugs in Adults with Hyperphosphatemia and Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Hyperphosphatemia is associated with cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in adults with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Drug therapy has an irreplaceable role in the management of hyperphosphatemia. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to compare and rank phosphorus-lowering drugs, including phosphate binder and nonphosphate binder, in hyperphosphatemia adults with CKD. METHODS: We did a systematic review and frequentist random-effect network meta-analysis. We searched in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase from inception to February 1, 2023, for randomized controlled trials of 12 phosphorus-lowering drugs in adults with hyperphosphatemia and CKD. Primary outcomes were efficacy (changes in serum phosphorus) and acceptability (treatment withdrawals due to any cause). We ranked each drug according to the value of surface under the cumulative ranking curve. We applied the Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis frameworks to rate the certainty of evidence. This study was registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42022322270. RESULTS: We identified 2,174 citations, and of these, we included 94 trials comprising 14,459 participants and comparing 13 drugs or placebo. In terms of efficacy, except for niacinamide, all drugs lowered the level of serum phosphorus compared with placebo, with mean difference ranging between -1.61 (95% credible interval [CrI], -2.60 to -0.62) mg/dL for magnesium carbonate and -0.85 (-1.66 to -0.05) mg/dL for bixalomer. Only ferric citrate with odds ratios 0.56 (95% CrI: 0.36-0.89) was significantly associated with fewer dropouts for acceptability. Of the 94 trials, 43 (46%), 7 (7%), and 44 (47%) trials were rated as high, moderate, and low risk of bias, respectively, the certainty of the evidence was moderate to very low. CONCLUSIONS: Magnesium carbonate has the best phosphorus-lowering effect in hyperphosphatemia adults with CKD; considering efficacy and acceptability, ferric citrate shows evidence to be the most appropriate drug with or without dialysis.

Progress in pharmacotherapy for the treatment of hyperphosphatemia in renal failure.

INTRODUCTION: Among the clinical and metabolic complications of progressive chronic kidney disease (CKD), CKD-mineral bone disorder (CKD-MBD) significantly contributes to morbidity and mortality. While overt and persistent hyperphosphatemia is typical of advanced CKD and requires treatment, other abnormalities of calcium/phosphate metabolism begin to occur since the early stages of the disease. AREAS COVERED: We searched on the PubMed database, without restrictions for language or time range, for randomized clinical trials and meta-analyses investigating phosphate-lowering therapies. The various phosphate binders show different safety profiles and diverse effects on calcium/phosphate metabolism and vascular calcification. The in-depth knowledge of the characteristics of these drugs is crucial to ensure adequate treatment to CKD patients. EXPERT OPINION: A proper control of serum phosphate can be achieved using phosphate binders. These medications may induce side effects. Moreover, data on their impact on clinical outcomes are partly controversial or scarce, especially for the new generation drugs. Hyperphosphatemia favors cardiovascular disease and increases the risk for CKD progression. These effects are partially mediated by fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23), a phosphaturic hormone that raises to maintain normal serum phosphate. Since there are no data supporting the use of phosphate-lowering agents when phosphataemia is normal, a key role is played by reducing dietary phosphate intake with the aim to control serum phosphate and the compensatory FGF23 and parathyroid hormone (PTH) increase.

PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: The progressive reduction in renal function, a condition known as chronic kidney disease (CKD), is characterized by several clinical and metabolic complications. Among them are the alterations of calcium and phosphorous metabolism that are part of the so-called CKD-MBD (chronic kidney disease-mineral bone disorder) and contribute to increase morbidity and mortality, especially due to vascular calcification. Persistent hyperphosphatemia is typical of advanced CKD but other abnormalities occur earlier to maintain normal serum calcium and phosphorus levels. These compensatory mechanisms are also involved in the pathophysiology of CKD-MBD and should be counteracted to improve clinical outcomes of CKD patients. Given the crucial role of hyperphosphatemia, numerous therapeutic strategies have been developed over time to help maintain phosphate serum levels within the normal range and prevent or treat CKD-MBD and its consequences. Phosphate binders act by binding dietary phosphate in the gastrointestinal lumen to prevent its absorption. According to their molecular structure, these drugs can be classified into calcium-based (calcium carbonate, calcium acetate), non-calcium-containing (sevelamer carbonate, sevelamer hydrochloride, lanthanum carbonate), aluminum-containing (aluminum hydroxide), and iron-based (sucroferric oxyhydroxide, ferric citrate) compounds. The various phosphate binders show different safety profiles and diverse effects on calcium/phosphate metabolism and vascular calcification. Despite the ability of hyperphosphatemia to favor CKD-MBD development and cardiovascular risk, there are no data supporting the use of phosphate-lowering agents when serum phosphate is normal also due to the potential adverse effects of long-term therapies. Accordingly, a key role is played by reducing dietary phosphate overload since the first stages of CKD.

Phosphate Control in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients: Issues, Solutions, and Open Questions.

Hyperphosphatemia is a common complication in advanced chronic kidney disease and contributes to cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The present narrative review focuses on the management of phosphatemia in uremic patients receiving peritoneal dialysis. These patients frequently develop hyperphosphatemia since phosphate anion behaves as a middle-size molecule despite its low molecular weight. Accordingly, patient transporter characteristics and peritoneal dialysis modalities and prescriptions remarkably influence serum phosphate control. Given that phosphate peritoneal removal is often insufficient, especially in lower transporters, patients are often prescribed phosphate binders whose use in peritoneal dialysis is primarily based on clinical trials conducted in hemodialysis because very few studies have been performed solely in peritoneal dialysis populations. A crucial role in phosphate control among peritoneal dialysis patients is played by diet, which must help in reducing phosphorous intake while preventing malnutrition. Moreover, residual renal function, which is preserved in most peritoneal dialysis patients, significantly contributes to maintaining phosphate balance. The inadequate serum phosphate control observed in many patients on peritoneal dialysis highlights the need for large and well-designed clinical trials including exclusively peritoneal dialysis patients to evaluate the effects of a multiple therapeutic approach on serum phosphate control and on hard clinical outcomes in this high-risk population.

Meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of sevelamer as hyperphosphatemia therapy for hemodialysis patients.

This study was designed to examine the relative safety and efficacy of sevelamer in the treatment of chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients in comparison to placebo, calcium carbonate (CC), or lanthanum carbonate (LC). The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases were searched for articles published through 18 June 2022. The quality of relevant studies was independently analyzed by two investigators who also extracted data from these manuscripts as per Cochrane Collaboration Handbook 5.3. The safety and efficacy of sevelamer as a treatment for hyperphosphatemia in CKD patients were then examined through a meta-analysis, with the primary patient-level outcomes of interest in this analysis being all-cause mortality and the incidence of gastrointestinal adverse effects. Vascular calcification score was also examined as an intermediate outcome, while serum biochemical parameters including levels of phosphate (P), calcium (Ca), intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH), lipids, C-reactive protein (CRP), or fibroblast growth factor-23 (FGF-23) were additionally assessed. In total, this meta-analysis incorporated data from 34 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) enrolling 2802 patients. Sevelamer was associated with reduced all-cause mortality (RR 0.28, CI 0.19 - 0.41, very low certainty) and Vessel calcification score (RR -0.58, CI -1.11 to -0.04, low certainty) and induced less hypercalcemia (MD -0.28, CI 0.40 to -0.16, low certainty) and hyperphosphatemia (MD -0.22, CI -0.32 to -0.13, low certainty) when compared with Ca-based binders in CKD5D individuals. No significant differences in gastrointestinal adverse events (GAEs) incidence were observed. These data suggest that sevelamer may represent a beneficial means of protecting CKD patients against death and vessel calcification when used to treat hyperphosphatemia, while we found no clinically important benefits in decreasing gastrointestinal adverse effects.

Efficacy and safety of tenapanor in hemodialysis patients with hyperphosphatemia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: The effects of tenapanor in reducing serum phosphorus in hemodialysis patients with hyperphosphatemia are uncertain and no relevant meta-analysis has been conducted. We performed a meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tenapanor. METHODS: All randomized controlled trials of tenapanor were searched up to 1 August 2022. The primary endpoint was the change in serum phosphorus level from baseline with tenapanor and placebo. Data on drug-related adverse events (AEs), gastrointestinal AEs and diarrhea were collected to determine the safety of tenapanor. RESULTS: There were 533 patients throughout five trials that were eligible. Tenapanor significantly lowered blood phosphorus level by 1.79 mg/dl in the mean difference than the placebo. Diarrhea, gastrointestinal AEs, and drug-related AEs were more severe than placebo. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis showed that although drug side effects were common, tenapanor significantly reduced serum phosphorus level in hemodialysis patients.

High Phosphate-Binding Capacity of Oxylanthanum Carbonate with a Low Medication Volume: Comparison with Commercially Available Phosphate Binders.

BACKGROUND: A key focus for chronic kidney disease management is phosphate control, but currently available binders have suboptimal phosphate-binding capacity, and their characteristics result in low adherence and poor phosphate regulation. Oxylanthanum carbonate, a novel compound that uses proprietary nanoparticle technology to deliver lanthanum, has the potential to combine high phosphate-binding capacity with good intake convenience, thus improving adherence and patient quality of life. The goal of this study was to assess the volume of oxylanthanum Carbonate required to bind 1 g of phosphate and compare it with other currently available phosphate binders to determine which binder allows for the highest normalized potency with the lowest daily medication volume. METHODS: Six phosphate binders were assessed: ferric citrate, calcium acetate, lanthanum carbonate, sevelamer carbonate, sucroferric oxyhydroxide, and oxylanthanum carbonate. Table volume measurements were taken using fluid displacement in corn oil or water. Mean daily dose volume to bind 1 g of phosphate was calculated as volume per tablet multiplied by the mean number of tablets taken per day. Volume to bind 1 g of phosphate was calculated by dividing the volume per tablet by its in vivo binding capacity. RESULTS: Oxylanthanum carbonate had the lowest mean volume, daily phosphate binder dose volume, and equivalent phosphate-binding dose volume (volume to bind 1 g of phosphate for each binder). CONCLUSIONS: Oxylanthanum carbonate has the lowest daily phosphate binder dose volume and the smallest volume required to bind 1 g of phosphate compared to all other commercially available phosphate binders. A randomized trial that compares gastrointestinal tolerability across binders would be warranted to demonstrate acceptability and adherence in the target population.

The Role of Iron-Based Phosphate Binder in the Treatment of Hyperphosphatemia.

Hyperphosphatemia is a well-known complication of kidney disease. Phosphate binders are a mainstay treatment, but despite the existence of several phosphate binders, there is no one best approach to manage hyperphosphatemia. Phosphate binders are calcium-based, non-calcium- based, and others. While calcium-based phosphate binders are used frequently, they may cause hypercalcemia. Conversely, lanthanum carbonate and sevelamer were not linked to hypercalcemia but are costlier. The most recently developed class of phosphate binders is the ironbased ferric citrate and sucroferric oxyhydroxide. These have an important role in controlling phosphate levels due to their ability to lower the phosphate while concurrently providing iron sources. This review provides pharmacological profiles of different phosphate binders and their clinical usages, and further elaborates on their place in hyperphosphatemia management.

Real-World Phosphate Binder Use among Dialysis-Dependent Patients with CKD.

INTRODUCTION: For patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), the need for phosphate binder (PB) treatment peaks at onset of dialysis. This real-world study assessed rates of PB utilization and switching in patients with dialysis-dependent CKD (DD-CKD). METHODS: We identified patients with PB utilization among those with prevalent DD-CKD using 2018-2019 Medicare Parts A/B/D data. Patients were assigned to cohorts based on primary (most frequently used) PB among calcium acetate, ferric citrate, lanthanum carbonate, sevelamer (hydrochloride and carbonate), sucroferric oxyhydroxide. We measured proportion of patients who were adherent (proportion of days covered >80%) and persistent (patients whose last 90 days of outpatient dialysis reported PB use). Net switching rates were calculated as the difference between switches to and from the primary agent. RESULTS: We identified 136,912 patients with PB use. Proportion of patients adherent ranged from 63.8% (lanthanum carbonate) to 67.7% (sevelamer) and persistent from 85.1% (calcium acetate) to 89.5% (ferric citrate). Most patients (73%) used the same PB throughout the study. Overall, 20.5% of patients experienced one switch and 2.3% two or more. Positive net switching rates were observed for ferric citrate, sucroferric oxyhydroxide, and lanthanum carbonate (2-10%) but negative for sevelamer and calcium acetate (-2% to -7%). CONCLUSION: Adherence and persistence rates were low with slight variation across PBs. Net positive switching occurred for ferric citrate, sucroferric oxyhydroxide, and lanthanum carbonate. Further studies are needed to determine the reasons for these findings and could identify opportunities for better control of phosphate levels among patients with CKD.